Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Archives of Disease in Childhood ; 107(Supplement 2):A338, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2064039

ABSTRACT

Aims Oral disease poses significant health, social and economic burden globally, often causing pain, infection, hospital admission and mortality. Dental caries (tooth decay) is amongst the most common health conditions despite being non-communicable and entirely preventable. The Global Burden of Disease Study estimated that greater than 530 million children suffer from caries in their primary dentition (WHO, 2020). Within the NHS, is it estimated that 25-30% of the overall paediatric waiting list consists of cases that require removal of grossly decayed teeth under general anaesthesia (GA) (figure 1). Between 2015 and 2016, the financial cost to the NHS of extractions amounted to 50.5M. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an existing burden within London NHS trusts of children on waiting lists for exodontia under GA. This issue has been further compounded by the cessation of elective dental activity in primary and secondary care settings due to the pandemic. Project Tooth Fairy was thus conceived to manage the growing paediatric GA waiting list. Methods Project Tooth Fairy is a collaborative, pan-London initiative designed to address London's growing paediatric GA waiting list. The new facility will employ clinical and non-clinical staff in a passport-type scheme allowing clinicians from different units to deliver care centrally in a purpose-built unit. The initiative started in November 2021. The project will deliver paediatric extractions, comprehensive care and complex oral surgery under GA. It will also serve as a source of training for dental trainees and anaesthetic trainees. Results Early results demonstrate that Project Tooth Fairy has treated over 250 children over two months, working with staff from over six NHS trusts, most cases comprising paediatric dental extractions. In March 2021, the total number of children waiting for paediatric GA across 19 London hospitals was around 14,400. To tackle the existing (and future) paediatric GA waiting lists in London, Project Tooth Fairy aims to increase capacity to treat 290 children over six days each week across three procedure rooms. Demand and capacity analysis suggests that approximately 212 procedures would be required each week (not including the backlog resulting from the pandemic). The backlog has seen a 61% increase from approximately 2,500 children waiting in March 2020 to an estimated 4,000 today, with projections of 7,000 by the time capacity is restored for P4 category work across London. It is estimated that 72% of these children have waited longer than 30 weeks, with greater than 1000 children waiting more than 52 weeks - a 96% increase in 52 week-waits compared to pre-COVID figures. The initiative also provides a more cost-effective solution due to the collaborative approach between trusts and staffing with an estimated saving of approximately 850,000 over 17 months compared to a more traditional system using two modular theatres. Conclusion Project Tooth Fairy is a more cost-effective and collaborative approach to tackling spiralling waiting lists within individual trusts. Nonetheless, a conceptual shift is needed away from 'downstream' strategies and those addressing the 'upstream' underlying inequalities in oral health across the population to achieve a more sustainable healthcare system.

2.
Blood ; 138:1942, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1582416

ABSTRACT

The impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on outcomes in patients with cancer remains unclear. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)/high-risk myelodysplasia (MDS) are common hematological malignancies resulting in profound immunosuppression, which is exacerbated by intensive and less-intensive chemotherapy. Importantly, venetoclax based regimens have been increasingly used during the pandemic as a strategy to reduce patient hospitalization however, there is little information concerning the impact of such regimens on COVID-19 infection rates. We therefore opened a prospective clinical study (PACE), at the start of the current pandemic in April 2020 to characterize the risk of COVID-19 infection in patients with AML/MDS-EB2 receiving intensive or non-intensive treatment, including patients treated with venetoclax-based regimens. The primary aim was to determine the incidence of COVID-19 in patients with AML /MDS-EB2 including both, prior to study entry and during treatment until 4 weeks after the last cycle of treatment. Secondary aims were to: characterize the presentation of COVID-19;define the severity and type of both non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 infections;and undertake an exploratory analysis to quantify the incidence of COVID-19 infection in patients receiving (less-intensive) venetoclax based regimens. All analysis conducted to date has been descriptive. 211/230 recruited patients had full treatment histories available, of whom 116 patients received intensive chemotherapy and 95 low intensity regimens. 48 patients received a venetoclax-based regimen. The median age of the non-intensive treatment arm was 72 years;(range 19.1-86.5) and of the intensive arm was 59 years (range 16.1-76.1). There were more cases of secondary AML and relapsed disease in the non-intensive arm as compared to the intensive arm. 25/226 evaluable patients tested positive for COVID-19 as defined by positive SARS-CoV2 PCR test, 10 with a prior diagnosis at study entry and 15 tested positive during the study. The incidence of COVID-19 infection for patients with AML/MDS-EB2 was 11.1% (90%CI: 7.8%-15.1%) (Table). A lower proportion of patients (n=6/91 6.6%) undergoing non-intensive treatment suffered COVID-19 as compared to those undergoing more intensive chemotherapy regimens (n=19/116, 16.4%). Specifically, only 3/48 (6.3%) patients undergoing a venetoclax regimen were infected with SARS-CoV2. The most common presenting symptoms of COVID-19 in this study, regardless of the intensity of chemotherapy, was fever and cough with 6/25 patients asymptomatic. The risk of death at 30 days following study entry in patients who had prior COVID-19 infection or who contracted COVID-19 during this period was 13.6%, compared to 3.9% in the overall cohort without COVID-19 infection. There was a lower incidence of non-COVID-19 related infections in patients receiving venetoclax-based regimens, n=43 infections in 24 (50.0%) of patients;with 313 infections in 94 (81%) of intensively treated patients. The overall occurrence of non-COVID-19 infection in the non-intensive arm was 87 infections in 50 (54.9%) patients. Our multi-center study provides real-world estimates for the incidence and presentation of COVID-19 infection in a cohort of patients with AML/MDS-EB2, and indicates a higher risk of death at 30 days in patients with prior COVID-19 infection prior to, or during treatment. Venetoclax based, and other non-intensive, regimens, increasingly implemented during the pandemic, to minimize patient exposure and reduce usage of hospital beds, appeared to be associated with a low incidence of COVID-19. Further follow-up will be required to understand the long-term impact of this strategy. Analysis of immune responses to COVID-19 infection and vaccination is on-going. Acknowledgments: This study was funded by Cure Leukaemia under the Trials Acceleration Program (TAP), and grants from BMS and Blood Cancer UK. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Loke: Novartis: Other: Travel;Janssen: Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria;Daichi Sankyo: Other: Travel. K apper: Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Astellas: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Speakers Bureau;Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Khan: Abbvie: Honoraria;Astellas: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;Jazz: Honoraria;Gilead: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria. Dillon: Amgen: Other: Research support (paid to institution);Astellas: Consultancy, Other: Educational Events, Speakers Bureau;Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Session chair (paid to institution), Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: educational events;Jazz: Other: Education events;Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research Support, Educational Events;Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Culligan: AbbVie Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Celgene Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Jazz Pharma: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Takeda UK Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. McMullin: Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: clinical trial support, Research Funding;Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;AOP Orphan: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Murthy: Abbvie: Other: support to attend educational conferences. Craddock: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board;Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL